What right does the child have to think he holds the answers to such things? In this post-modern world where "reason" dominates, shouldn't some adult guide chastise him for imagining that he holds the answers to such things that are so far beyond him? Shouldn't someone sweep in with the "Origin of Species", charts of the modern diesel engine, or a naturalist guide to the defense mechanisms of plants and animals.
Further, how dare he believe that there is enough coherence in the natural world to imagine that there would be a logical reason for anything?
How dare he grow to graduate through the stages of life, glory in the beauty and grace of his wife, and search through the night sky to find an answer to a question that is too deep to ask, sensing that there must be an answer.
Why does the natural man have to be taught, using such ordered and well labeled arguments, that there are no coherent answers? Why must hope be expertly pulled from his grasping hands?
Without God, there is no coherence, no argument, no invention, no answers, no hope. There is no peg board with which to hang speech, thought or even the passage of time.
Those that argue for the randomness of existence use borrowed language, borrowed reason and borrowed time.
We love that child for his searching heart, because it speaks of that unfathomable, greater mystery which beckons all of our searching hearts, and cannot honestly be denied.
Ask yourself this:
Why is there a question at our core?
And if a question defines the human condition, might there be an answer? Could it be that we were designed to ask it?
No comments:
Post a Comment